Joe Manchin ‘not running’ for president, considers political future as potential GOP challengers loom

Joe Manchin ‘not running’ for president, considers political future as potential GOP challengers loom

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., has narrowed down his possibilities regarding his political upcoming for the 2024 election cycle, announcing Wednesday he was not managing for president at this time.

“I’m not managing for President of the United States. I can assure you of that as we sit below now,” Manchin informed MetroNews through a radio job interview broadcast from the Condition Capitol in Charleston, West Virginia.

The two-time period senator and previous governor of the point out afterwards hinted that he was not ruling out a conclusion to run some time in the potential, and that he required to be in the ideal situation to “deliver the country with each other.”

Manchin also would not say if he experienced decided to run for re-election to keep his seat in the U.S. Senate, as Republicans eye the seat as a top focus on to flip in the 2024 election cycle.

DEMOCRAT JOE MANCHIN HITS BIDEN ADMINISTRATION FOR EAST PALESTINE Response

"I'm not running for President of the United States," Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., said Wednesday.

“I am not managing for President of the United States,” Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., said Wednesday. (Gaelen Morse/Bloomberg by way of Getty Images)

Republican candidates are by now lining up to try out and unseat Manchin ought to he decide to run all over again, which include Rep. Alex Mooney, who signifies West Virginia’s 2nd Congressional District.

Republican Gov. Jim Justice is also rumored to be mulling a run. He was first elected as a Democrat in the 2016 gubernatorial election, but switched functions at a rally with then-President Donald Trump in 2017, and was in the long run re-elected as a Republican in 2020.

JOE MANCHIN Calls ‘BULLS–T’ ON DEMOCRATS’ Thrust TO Immediately Stop FOSSIL FUELS

Republican West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice.

Republican West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice. (Reuters)

West Virginia Lawyer General Patrick Morrisey, who was the Republican nominee defeated by Manchin in 2018, is also reportedly thinking of another run.

No other Democrats have introduced their intention to be a part of the race, presumably until finally Manchin would make a choice on his candidacy.

Simply click TO GET THE FOX Information Application

Then-Republican U.S. Senate candidate Patrick Morrisey speaks at a campaign event in Inwood, West Virginia, on Oct. 22, 2018.

Then-Republican U.S. Senate prospect Patrick Morrisey speaks at a marketing campaign function in Inwood, West Virginia, on Oct. 22, 2018. (Acquire McNamee/Getty Visuals)

Manchin was initial elected in a 2010 particular election ahead of becoming elected to a comprehensive six-year time period in 2012. He was narrowly re-elected for a 2nd time period in 2018, but has drawn ire from his purple-point out constituents soon after supporting President Biden’s huge $739 billion Inflation Reduction Act very last year.

January 6 committee considers criminal referrals for at least 4 others besides Trump

January 6 committee considers criminal referrals for at least 4 others besides Trump



CNN
 — 

The Home select committee investigating the January 6, 2021, insurrection is thinking of prison referrals for at least four people today in addition to previous President Donald Trump, several sources instructed CNN.

The panel is weighing criminal referrals for previous White House chief of employees Mark Meadows, correct wing law firm John Eastman, previous Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark and Trump’s previous lawyer Rudy Giuliani, the sources explained.

The committee has not officially made a decision whom to refer to the Justice Office for prosecution and for what offenses, resources reported. The 4 people who are amongst people under thought, and whose names have not been earlier noted, give a window into the panel’s deliberations.

A further supply cautioned that whilst names are getting deemed, there is even now discussion prior to names are finalized.

Even though the felony referrals would largely be symbolic in character – as the DOJ has currently undertaken a sprawling investigation into the US Capitol attack and efforts to overturn the 2020 election – committee associates have stressed that the go serves as a way to document their views for the document.

A spokesperson for the January 6 committee declined to comment.

Committee Chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat, reported Thursday that committee users are expected to achieve a selection on prison referrals when members meet virtually on Sunday.

Thompson told reporters on Thursday how associates developed to the plan of issuing criminal referrals as the panel’s investigation went on.

“I consider the a lot more we appeared at the human body of proof that we experienced collected, we just felt that when we’re not in the enterprise of investigating men and women for felony things to do, we just couldn’t forget some of them.”

Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, who potential customers the January 6 subcommittee tasked with presenting suggestions on criminal referrals to the complete committee, said Thursday, “I consider everyone who engages in felony steps needs to be held accountable for them. And we are heading to spell that out.”

“The gravest offense in constitutional conditions is the endeavor to overthrow a presidential election and bypass the constitutional get,” Raskin informed reporters. “Subsidiary to all of that are a full host of statutory offenses, which assistance the gravity and magnitude of that violent assault on The us.”

Raskin, along with Democratic Reps. Adam Schiff and Zoe Lofgren, the two of California, and the panel’s vice chair GOP Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, comprise the subcommittee.

Schiff advised CNN there is a “consensus amid the members” pertaining to referrals and that members are getting a unified solution on that entrance.

Thompson explained to reporters earlier this 7 days, “we will make referrals. As to how numerous, we have not made a decision that yet.” CNN earlier described that the committee is weighing Trump and a range of his closest allies for criminal referrals.

Thompson explained the panel is aiming to release its ultimate report and vote publicly on legal referrals on December 21.

“There will be some sort of community presentation. We have not resolved exactly what that would be,” Thompson claimed.

The committee subpoenaed Meadows for files and testimony in September of last 12 months, and he handed above much more than 2,000 text messages he despatched and received amongst Election Day 2020 and Joe Biden’s inauguration. The textual content messages, which have been obtained by CNN, reveal how best Republican Celebration officers, proper-wing figures and even Trump’s spouse and children members mentioned with Meadows what Trump really should say and do right after the election and in the center of the insurrection.

Meadows did not convert around other paperwork he experienced, and the Dwelling committee voted to maintain him in legal contempt of Congress for it and for his refusal to testify, referring the make any difference to the Justice Office. The Justice Division has declined to indict Meadows for evading his subpoena, supplied his higher degree position in the Trump West Wing and promises of executive privilege.

Raskin also advised Thursday that earlier referrals to DOJ for contempt of Congress would not influence how the panel handles these legal referrals.

“We naturally did contempt of Congress referrals previously and there is a full statutory course of action for earning that transpire,” he explained. “But you know we will explain our decisions in detail – why we are producing specified types of referrals for specified people today and other sorts for other people.”

Eastman sat for an job interview with the panel past yr, but invoke his Fifth Modification legal rights that protect in opposition to self-incrimination.

In the midst of a lawful struggle to obtain Eastman’s e-mail, a federal decide ruled in March that Eastman, along with Trump, might have been arranging a crime as they sought to disrupt the January 6 congressional certification of the presidential election. The FBI seized Eastman’s cell phone in June as part of its prison investigation according to a courtroom submitting from Eastman.

David O. Carter, a federal judge in California, purchased Eastman to change about 101 emails from the period around January 6, 2021, that he has tried to continue to keep key from the Dwelling pick out committee, which soon after a lengthy court struggle, the panel finally gained.

Carter’s reasoning was a essential acknowledgment by a federal court that Trump’s fascination in overturning the election could be regarded felony.

“The illegality of the approach was noticeable,” Carter wrote.

In a hearing over the summer months, the panel presented revelations that delivered new perception into Eastman’s job as a central determine in the exertion led by Trump to overturn the outcomes of the 2020 presidential election. Eastman was integral to the powerful pressure marketing campaign that Trump directed at then-Vice President Mike Pence to compel Pence to support carry out a system to overturn the election final results.

In the hearing, the committee walked by how Eastman put forward a legal idea that Pence could unilaterally block certification of the election – a idea that was roundly rejected by Trump’s White Household attorneys and Pence’s workforce, but was even so embraced by the former President.

Clark invoked the Fifth Modification a lot more than 100 occasions throughout his deposition with the committee. Federal investigators have raided Clark’s residence as component of their very own legal investigation.

The previous DOJ formal was dealing with a criminal contempt of Congress referral at the time immediately after he refused to response the committee’s inquiries at a prior deposition. The referral was under no circumstances sent to DOJ due to the fact on the day the committee voted on the contempt referral, Clark’s attorney educated the committee that he planned to invoke his Fifth Amendment correct to not respond to questions on the grounds it could incriminate him.

The panel dedicated a great deal of a June listening to to Clark’s purpose in Trump’s attempts to weaponize the Justice Department in the last months of his time period as portion of the plot to overturn the 2020 election and stay in electric power.

The committee in specific zeroed in on the efforts of Rep. Scott Perry, the Pennsylvania Republican, who connected Clark to the White Home in December 2020.

CNN has formerly noted on the position that Perry performed, and the committee in court docket filings released text messages Perry exchanged with Meadows about Clark.

“He preferred Mr. Clark – Mr. Jeff Clark to choose above the Division of Justice,” Cassidy Hutchinson, a previous Meadows aide, claimed about Perry in a clip of her deposition that was played at that hearing.

Giuliani, Trump’s onetime individual attorney and a guide architect of his endeavor to overturn the 2020 election success, achieved with the panel in May for much more than nine hrs.

In its first subpoena, the committee alleges that Giuliani “actively promoted statements of election fraud on behalf of the former President and sought to encourage state legislators to choose measures to overturn the election final results.” The subpoena also stated that Giuliani was in get in touch with with Trump and users of Congress “regarding procedures for delaying or overturning the final results of the 2020 election.”

This tale has been up-to-date with additional particulars.

Pac-12 in danger of eventual collapse as Big Ten considers further expansion, Big 12 interest looms

Pac-12 in danger of eventual collapse as Big Ten considers further expansion, Big 12 interest looms

The Big Ten’s continued pursuit of four Pac-12 schools is leading to concern that another round of expansion could collapse the Pac-12, industry sources tell CBS Sports. This as Big Ten commissioner Kevin Warren continues to seek an offer from Amazon, or potentially another partner, for additional Big Ten football media rights revenue.

An offer deemed substantial enough would likely convince Big Ten presidents that California, Oregon, Stanford and Washington would be valuable additions to the league from the Pac-12. That figure is believed to be less than $100 million annually.

If the Big Ten makes such a move, it would almost certainly increase the likelihood the Big 12 is able to get some combination of Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado and Utah from the Pac-12, thus crushing the Pac-12 and hanging Oregon State and Washington State out to dry.

“If that [Big Ten move] happens, I think the other [four Pac-12] schools will want to jump to our league,” said a Big 12 source familiar with the situation.

Without a clear mandate, Big Ten presidents and athletic directors continue to evaluate whether expansion is “financially viable” and potential candidates are a “cultural fit,” conference sources tell CBS Sports. No vote has been taken on expansion at this time.

The Big Ten completed a historic media rights deal last month worth more than $8 billion over seven years beginning in 2023. Amazon reportedly bid more for the Big Ten’s 3:30 p.m. ET and primetime windows compared to other suitors. Those windows went to CBS and NBC, respectively.

If the Big Ten indeed turned down such an offer, the concerns were likely distribution and visibility. Those same concerns would be in play if the Big Ten accepted the four additional Pac-12 schools.

Industry chatter has Oregon State and Washington State moving to the Mountain West if the Pac-12 collapses. At that point, the MWC would replace the Pac-12 as the largest FBS conference completely located in the Mountain and Pacific Time Zones.

Adding to the intrigue, the Big Ten and Big 12 share the same media rights consultant, Endeavor, a global sports and entertainment company.

CBS Sports reported last month Endeavor was advising the Big 12 about whether it should add Pac-12 programs. Earlier this summer, CBS Sports reported the Big 12 was interested in the aforementioned “Four Corners” programs.

Since then, officials from Oregon and Washington have met with the Big Ten, according to multiple media reports. Earlier this month, Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark said, for the first time publicly, he was interested in expanding to the Pac-12 footprint.

“Obviously going out west is where I would like to go — entering that fourth time zone,” he told The Athletic.

Whether the Big Ten expands again, the Big 12 is expected to remain interested in either two or four Pac-12 schools.

The potential for further realignment — following the migration of USC and UCLA to the Big Ten — has caused disruption in the industry.

Pac-12 commissioner George Kliavkoff told CBS Sports in July: “Let’s be very clear: No Pac-12 school is joining the Big 12.”

Publicly, the remaining 10 Pac-12 schools have showed a united front. The league moved up negotiations for a new media rights deal in July. The difference is the Big Ten already has its new deal in place. Signed in August, the media rights agreement further solidified the Big Ten’s top spot in earnings. Beginning in 2023, Big Ten schools are expected to earn an average of $75 million annually.

Meanwhile, the current Big 12 deal with Fox and ESPN doesn’t expire until 2025; however, the Big 12 opened media rights discussions with its partners early and hopes to strike a deal earlier and richer than what the Pac-12 can acquire. The conference reported $46.2 million distributed to each of its schools in the last fiscal year. That includes Oklahoma and Texas, which are due to move to the SEC in 2025 at the latest.

Industry sources value a 10-team Pac-12 at $21 million to $30 million per school annually after the loss of USC and UCLA. The Pac-12’s deal with Fox and ESPN expires in 2024.

The possibility of a merger between the Big 12 and Pac-12 was ruled out in July. Any combination of Big 12 and Pac-12 programs would not result in a significant revenue increase compared to those teams remaining with their conferences, multiple industry sources stated repeatedly over the last few months.

Big 12 sources pushed back at that assertion saying the league’s next media rights contract — including newcomers BYU, Cincinnati, Houston and UCF — will reflect an increase from the current deal.

It is believed the Big Ten’s current rightsholders, Fox and ESPN, remain opposed to the conference expanding further. It is in the best interests of both networks for there to be a Pac-12, if for no other reason than cost certainty. After losing out on the new Big Ten deal, ESPN aims to acquire games that can be played in the “fourth window” — after 10 p.m. Fox already has games in that window through its agreement with the Mountain West.

As the Big Ten’s primary partner, Fox would likely consider four additional Pac-12 schools “dilutive” to the Big Ten product. Opponents of Big Ten expansion continue to scratch their heads wondering how Cal, Oregon, Stanford and Washington can bring enough value to the conference.

The answer? They don’t. At least at first glance. However, Warren’s play may be to get in on the ground floor with Amazon during a time in which when streaming is further catching up with linear cable. That hasn’t happened yet despite Amazon’s NFL ratings success this season with “Thursday Night Football.”

Adding four more Pac-12 schools would result in expanded Big Ten content, giving the conference approximately 112 games annually. Amazon, or the newest media partner, would likely get the fifth, sixth or seventh pick of a Big Ten home game each week.

One industry observer compared the level of potentially available content equal to what is currently shown weekly on the Big Ten Network. Think about games like California vs. Rutgers, Northwestern vs. Stanford and Oregon vs. Indiana. (As CBS Sports reported last week, the newest media partner would not get any games involving Michigan, Ohio State or Penn State.)

A different industry critic stressed there is no strategic reason for the Big Ten to expand further. In fact, that person thought expansion might invite lawsuits from slighted programs and possible scrutiny from the federal government.

If the Big Ten and/or Big 12 make a move for Pac-12 programs, the potential collapse of the Pac-12 could come amid FBS commissioners expanding the College Football Playoff. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey is among those who have advocated for CFP expansion to make the sport more of a national game.

The Pac-12 has participated in the CFP only twice in eight years.